Proven Research
AIRMAX® is More Effective than Breathe Right®
AIRMAX® vs. Breathe Right® Clinical Study Results
Clinical Study Details
- The Safronov clinical trial showed a better efficacy of AIRMAX® vs. Breathe Right® in terms of reduction in air resistance in the nose
- The total resistance was measured on 24 patients and showed a higher efficacy for the AIRMAX®
- The overall reduction in air resistance (vs. no usage of any nasal dilator) is 3.6 times higher with the AIRMAX®
Clinical Study Source
Non-invasive modality of snoring treatment and OSAS prophylactics (K. Vogt, K. Perksis, Y. Safronov). The effect of the device was tested by 4 phase Rhinomanometry as well by VAS (visual analog scale) in healthy subjects during normal and accelerated breathing.
The AIRMAX® Nasal Dilator works.
A majority of patients tested said they would choose to keep using it.
All patients tested showed major benefit from the AIRMAX® nasal dilator.
Study 1
STUDY TITLE
Effective application of nasal dilators in snoring and mild sleep apnea
LOCATION
University of Latvia Faculty of Medicine Riga, Latvia
KEY FINDINGS
The AIRMAX® device reduced snoring loudness and duration in all patients tested.
Study 2
STUDY TITLE
Non-invasive modality of snoring treatment and OSAS prophylactics
LOCATION
MEDEM International Clinic and Hospital St. Petersburg, Russia
KEY FINDINGS
The AIRMAX® device can be tried as an effective method against mild forms of sleep disorder.
AIRMAX® represents a powerful device to improve the nasal breathing in patients with nasal obstruction due to external nasal valve problems.
Study 3
STUDY TITLE
Improvement of nasal breathing & patient satisfaction by the endonasal dilator AIRMAX® (June, 2013)
LOCATION
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery University Hospitals Leuven and Ghent, Belgium
KEY FINDINGS
A majority of patients expressed preference to continue use of the device (2/3 of those tested).
All patients with external valve dysfunction showed major benefit from the dilator.